Doug Ford says Canada would like a tariff refund from Trump

Ontario Premier Doug Ford told CNN he would like Canada to be reimbursed for U.S. tariff revenue and called the U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down those tariffs a positive development; the court did not rule on whether collected revenues should be returned.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford said Canada would like reimbursement for U.S. tariff revenue and urged a resolution after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a set of Donald Trump’s border tariffs. He spoke to CNN and to reporters at Queen’s Park, linking the tariffs to higher prices and noting public attention ahead of U.S. midterm elections. Ford also warned against rushing trade deals and said some countries that moved quickly to cut tariffs later faced problems. The federal government in Ottawa has been largely quiet, while a review of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) is upcoming. Key points: - Ford said Canada would like a refund of U.S. tariff revenue collected before the Supreme Court ruling and emphasized the need for a negotiated resolution. - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the president lacked authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose the border emergency tariffs, and it did not decide whether the United States must reimburse the revenues. - Estimates cited in reporting put revenues collected under the tariffs in a broad range, reported as roughly $130 billion to $170 billion. - Ford told CNN he has observed many Canadians supporting Democrats ahead of the U.S. midterm elections and warned against hasty agreements with the U.S. administration. - The White House responded to the court ruling by announcing a separate 10 per cent global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, with an exemption for Canada and Mexico on qualifying CUSMA-origin goods; the president later threatened to raise that rate to 15 per cent. Summary: The article describes how Ford framed the court decision and the tariff dispute as a matter requiring careful diplomatic negotiation rather than rushed deals. Ottawa’s public response has been limited, and the evolving legal and political developments — including a CUSMA review and upcoming U.S. midterm elections — are likely to shape next steps and discussions.